Once we can't manipulate the address limit, we also can't test what
happens when the manipulation is abused.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
I'd like arch-specific tests to XFAIL when on a mismatched architecture
so that we can more easily compare test coverage across all systems.
Lacking kernel configs or CPU features count as a FAIL, not an XFAIL.
Additionally fixes a build failure under 32-bit UML.
Fixes: b09511c253 ("lkdtm: Add a DOUBLE_FAULT crash type on x86")
Fixes: cea23efb4d ("lkdtm/bugs: Make double-fault test always available")
Fixes: 6cb6982f42 ("lkdtm: arm64: test kernel pointer authentication")
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200625203704.317097-5-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This adds a basic framework for running all the "safe" LKDTM tests. This
will allow easy introspection into any selftest logs to examine the
results of most LKDTM tests.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
